Best & Cheapest Object Storage for CDN Purpose

The cost of storing vast amounts of data in a conventional setting is high. Let’s investigate the most affordable unstructured data storage option on the market.

Thanks to cloud storage, which simplifies the process and reduces the cost without sacrificing the data’s quality and safety.

Object storage may be used to store photographs, videos, audio files, PDFs, papers, static data, etc. This may also be used for static website hosting and backup purposes.

A benefit of cloud storage is the ability to upload and download data from anywhere on the Internet, as well as the opportunity to limit access.

Therefore, you have the choice between the two alternatives depending on your needs. Additionally, you only pay for what you use.

So, let us look at some of the cheapest object storage for CDN.

11 Best and Cheapest Object Storage for CDN Purpose in 2022

contabo object storage provider

Contabo’s object storage is a great way to keep your data safe and accessible. You can store any type of file, and you can access it from anywhere in the world. Plus, you get unlimited storage space, so you can keep as much data as you need.

S3 compatible object storage is a storage service that provides interoperability between Amazon S3 and other storage services. You get this with Contabo and for a very reasonable cost of just $2.5 per month. Within that cost, you get 250GB of storage.

  • S3-compatible API
  • Drag-n-drop Web Interface
  • Link Sharing
  • Built-In Redundancy
  • DDoS Protection
contabo object storage is cheap

When compared to some of the leading object storage providers, Contabo has the lowest cost for object storage. The pricing is straightforward and predictable.

PROS

  • Unlimited free transfer to AWS S3.
  • DDoS protection round the clock.
  • Object scaling limitlessly.
  • Manage public access to shared links to storage.
  • Easy storage management with WebUI.

CONS

  • Only S3 API compatible.

vultr object storage

In addition to their VPS instances, the majority of cloud providers provide their object storage solutions nowadays. Inaugurated in August of 2019, Vultr is a new entrant in this market.

Their Object Storage service was introduced approximately two months before Linode’s offering.

Vultr’s S3-compatible Object Storage has comparable pricing and features to DigitalOcean Spaces. Vultr’s $ 5/mo for a bucket with 250 GB storage and 1000 GB bandwidth is comparable to Spaces’ $ 5 per month.

There are no fees associated with reads, writes, or API queries.

Vultr has seventeen sites globally. However, New Jersey (United States) is presently the sole accessible location for Object Storage. Hopefully, they will provide it in further areas shortly.

PROS

  • Simple & flexible pricing.
  • Scalable and durable.
  • NVMe caching layer.
  • Automatic backups.
  • Save historical logs.

CONS

  • Managing control panel could be tricky.

linode s3 object storage

Linode may be familiar to developers as a cloud VPS provider. Since 2003, they have been in business. However, their Object Storage Solution was not introduced until October of 2019.

There are a total of 10 Linode sites worldwide. With data centers in Mumbai, Tokyo, and Sydney, they have a strong presence in the Asia-Pacific area.

Object storage is now accessible exclusively in Newark, Frankfurt, and Singapore. According to their infrastructure website, it will soon be available in other areas.

Linode Storage costs $ 5 per month and offers 250GB of storage and 1TB of outbound transfer (downloads). API queries are free. Charges will be prorated if you terminate the plan after a month and a half.

PROS

  • S3 compatible.
  • Scalable data storage.
  • 24/7 availability.
  • No VMs required.
  • Host static websites.

CONS

  • Only 5GB of upload file size limit.

ibm object storage for cdn

IBM is the last enterprise-grade cloud provider on our list. Their Cloud Object Storage solution is used by well-known firms like Zenfolio and Bitly to serve their consumers.

According to some user reports, IBM’s platform is somewhat more difficult to use than S3’s; nevertheless, I have not tried it myself. Therefore, if you are a small-scale user, this option may not be optimal.

Although now marketed under the IBM name, this object storage service was not originally developed by IBM. Instead, circa 2015, IBM purchased a storage service provider called CleverSafe and incorporated it into their services.

PROS

  • Multi-cloud locations.
  • Best cost optimization.
  • High data security.
  • Easily manage critical workloads.
  • Reduce downtime.

CONS

  • Free trial offers only 2 GB storage for 30 days.

rackspace cloud files

Rackspace was founded in 2008, making it one of the early suppliers of cloud computing with Amazon and Google Cloud. The name of their object storage system is Cloud Files. With over 35 global locations, they provide a vast selection of data centers.

However, you may be concerned about their price. In addition to the CDN bandwidth fee, which is $ 0.12 per GB, the beginning price for storage is a staggering $ 0.10 per GB (or $ 100 for 1 TB).

However, incoming bandwidth is free. However, it is about five times the cost of S3 storage. Currently, there is no rationale for such a high price, according to an assessment.

The infrastructure supplied by Rackspace is of the highest quality. Akamai, one of the major content delivery network providers, powers the embedded CDN.

Therefore, your users will get your content from one of Akamai’s edge sites that is geographically closest to them.

PROS

  • VMware multi-cloud environment.
  • 24/7/365.
  • Faster cloud storage system.
  • End-to-end transformation.
  • Cloud security solutions.

CONS

  • No pricing options displayed.

google cloud storage

If you are familiar with AWS, you may also be familiar with the Google Cloud Platform. It is another enterprise-level cloud service on par with Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure.

With around 24 regions and over 140 sites, Google Cloud has a global footprint. GCP offers a comprehensive alternative to AWS, not simply for object storage.

Standard is the option to choose if you like to often access your things (equivalent to the Hot class in Azure).

This does not have a minimum storage period. In contrast, the minimum storage length for an archive is 365 days. Early deletion might cost more.

 A monthly free limit of 5 GB storage, 5k class A operations, 50k class B operations, and 1 GB egress is also provided. This free tier is ideal for evaluating the platform.

PROS

  • Automatic object movement.
  • SLA-backed replication.
  • Fast storage transfer.
  • Security feature like signed URL.
  • In-depth open-source analytics.

CONS

  • Only archival storage provides 365 days storage.

azure blob storage

All of the aforementioned goods have far simpler structures than Amazon S3. However, Microsoft’s Azure Blob Storage is pretty comparable to S3 in terms of cost and tiering complexity.

Azure, like Amazon Web Services, is an enterprise-level service that may not be suitable for small customers.

Their Hot tier is appropriate for material that is regularly accessed. Therefore, it has a lower cost of access and a greater cost of storage. In contrast, the Archive is ideal for seldom accessed data. Cold exists somewhere in the between.

PROS

  • Build powerful mobile apps.
  • Flexible scaling.
  • High-performance computing workloads.
  • Secured with role-based access control.
  • Multi-protocol access.

CONS

  • Only chat support can be seen.

backblazeb2 cloud storage

Backblaze B2 is one of the most affordable object storage services currently available. Priced at $0.005/GB/mo for storage and $0.01 per GB for downloads, B2 advertises itself as being one-fourth as expensive as Amazon S3.

The first 10 GB are also free. Backblaze B2 has no minimum monthly fees, unlike comparable services like Wasabi or DigitalOcean Spaces.

Multiple access keys with distinct permissions may be generated. It is quite handy for creating safe backups of websites.

B2 Dashboard is likewise fairly user-friendly. You can build buckets and access keys without having to go through many menus. There is also a command-line interface (CLI) for command-line administration.

PROS

  •  S3 Compatible APIs, SDKs, and CLI
  • Media management tools.
  • Plug-n-play
  • 99.9% uptime SLA.
  • Flexible & predictable pricing.

CONS

  • Phone support only with upgraded plan.

wasabi cloud storage

Wasabi was founded in 2017, making it a relative newcomer among storage providers. Wasabi focuses only on storage, unlike the firms listed above that also provide cloud servers.

They market themselves as being 80 percent less expensive than Amazon S3. In addition to being less expensive, the pricing structure is far more straightforward.

There are also no difficulty levels. Since egress and requests are free, you should not worry about unanticipated charges. Even if you do not store anything with them for a month, there is a $ 5.99 minimum monthly payment.

PROS

  • Ransomware protection.
  • Less costly than Amazon S3.
  • No Egress fees.
  • Immutable storage.
  • Unlimited backup storage.

CONS

  • Support is unpredictable.

dreamobjects overview

DreamObjects is an object storage solution provided by DreamHost, a well-known web hosting business recognized for its WordPress web hosting services.

As an organization that supports open-source initiatives, DreamObjects is powered by the open-source Ceph software.

DreamObjects, like the majority of the other providers on this list, is compatible with S3 API. Not all functionalities are supported, though. It supports Access Control Levels (ACLs), however, bucket policies are not completely supported.

The pricing is much less than Amazon S3. The storage fee is $ 0.025 per GB per month, while the download cost is $ 0.05 per GB per month. Additionally, DreamHost offers a free 30-day trial for DreamObjects.

You may administer your buckets and access keys directly from the DreamHost control panel – the same location from which you administer your hosting accounts.

According to their website, the object storage service’s data center is in Irvine, California. 

DreamObjects may not offer many capabilities, but it is a cost-effective option for website backups and media storage.

PROS

  • Open-source & secure cloud storage.
  • Scalable & redundant servers.
  • Free API request.
  • Automatic WordPress backups.
  • Compatible with Cloudberry, Retrospect.

CONS

  • No phone support, only chat & email.

bunny content delivery

Bunny Edge Storage is an international cloud storage service. Once the files have been posted, they are accessible from anywhere.

It allows you to distribute material over four continents and provides five times quicker download and latency speeds than conventional cloud storage.

Bunny Edge Storage can duplicate your data, ensuring that no data is lost in the event of a data center failure. In addition, it immediately interacts with Bunny CDN, allowing you to enjoy improved speed and cost savings as a result of the CDN services and storage connected inside.

You may upload your files to the cloud via HTTP API, FTP, or a file manager and then access them from anywhere. The performance of Bunny Edge Storage is optimized by limitless scalability, intelligent location, and direct CDN integration.

Additionally, you may compare the benchmark to typical storage companies.

The average worldwide latency for Bunny Edge Storage is 41 milliseconds, which is the lowest among competitors. The average result for the worldwide throughput challenge is 58.3 MB per second, which is the greatest among all other providers.

Start your FREE trial now with plans beginning at $ 0.01 per GB per month in Europe. You may also pick two, three, or four regions simultaneously.

PROS

  • 15 storage regions.
  • 112 global CDN PoPs.
  • 99.99% SLA uptime guaranteed.
  • 5x faster delivery.
  • Unlimited scaling.

CONS

  • Only 14-day free trial.

stackpath object storage

StackPath is an object storage solution with no hidden trickery. Instead, it is more affordable and delivers superior performance.

Its performance is superior to other cloud storage choices. And when combined with Edge computing or StackPath’s CDN, the speed is boosted even more.

Its strong performance is a result of its system design, which offers around 6x quicker and more reliable performance.

StackPath is fully interoperable with Amazon S3, which needs identical API structures for identity management and storage. This eliminates the need to modify the current application.

It also demonstrates better performance for Time-to-First-Byte (TTFB), which is under 15 milliseconds, much less than the TTFB supplied by competitors.

After uploading an item to a bucket, you may instantly read it, removing a common problem that AWS developers encounter regularly.

You incur no additional expenses for data transport or API calls or requests while providing content over their CDN. As a consequence, using StackPath may result in savings of about 50 percent.

PROS

  • RESTful APIs.
  • Easy to manage portal.
  • Deploy powerful apps.
  • 60% less latency
  • 80% cache hit ratio.
  • Layer-7 DDoS mitigation.

CONS

  • Only US-based phone support.

Why Do I Recommend Object Storage for CDN?

With the improved capabilities of current gadgets, unstructured data continues to rise significantly each year. These gadgets create many emails, photos, and audio and video data. Growing quantities of unstructured data are challenging to organize, manage, and search. Here comes object storage into play.

Object storage is great for organizing, managing, and searching through large amounts (200 TB+) of unstructured and heterogeneous data.

Object storage solutions also enable businesses to begin making sense of the available big data and extracting insights that support the development of business objectives.

1. Convenient:

Object storage meets the requirements of a mobile workforce. Object files have a unique URL that can be viewed from anywhere in the world and on any device due to the HTTP interface.

Object storage is ideal for vast amounts of unstructured data that do not need to be often changed. After changing object files, it may take some time for all replicas to reflect the changes; this phenomenon is known as “eventual consistency.”

This indicates that object storage is not the optimal solution for data generated by quick read/write operations. Media, online content, archives, documents, log files, and device-generated data are the most suitable content kinds for object storage.

2. Cost-effective:

Less hardware is required for big data volumes, which contributes to object storage’s cost-effectiveness. Also, cloud object storage is often obtained as an OpEx solution utilizing a pay-as-you-go pricing model.

3. Unlimited Scalability:

As object storage expands, it may be horizontally expanded by adding nodes. Metadata remains with objects, which enables a flat system, sometimes known as storage pools. In situations with flat data, scalability is almost unbounded. Large amounts of data do not cause object storage to become inefficient and difficult to handle, unlike conventional storage.

4. Automated Information Life Cycle Management:

 Based on information supplied in metadata, object files may maintain, repair, retire, erase, and deduplicate themselves, making information life cycle management incredibly efficient.

5. Archive Management:

 Object storage systems are great for digitizing and archiving historical documents and audio and video recordings due to their specific metadata and resilience.

6. Resiliency:

 When an item is generated, depending on the rules in place, it is copied to one or more nodes. Typically, nodes are geographically dispersed, enabling automated, cost-effective disaster recovery for object files.

7. Custom Metadata & Searchability:

Metadata remains inside the objects themselves throughout object storage. There is no need to construct databases to link metadata to objects.

An object file’s metadata may be customized depending on its contents, dates, user information, permissions, etc.

Over time, attributes may be altered and added. Due to the use of customer information, object storage is extremely searchable.

Users may do searches that return a list of files that fit specified criteria, such as what proportion of files are of a particular kind or was generated by a particular owner.

This enables businesses to gain insights from the large amounts of data in their files and find patterns.

Is CDN an object storage?

Choosing an object storage server along with CDN offers faster download and file sharing.

Is object storage expensive?

Yes, object storage offered by some reputed companies come at an expensive price. But not if you choose Contabo object storage that cost you only $2.49 per 250 GB per month.

Conclusion

I am aware that there are various options for cloud-based data storage. The best way to decide is to test them out. The majority of the cloud storage service companies mentioned above provide a FREE trial.

Alternatively, if you choose to host them on-premises, you may use S3-compliant software that is self-hosted.

Alex

Alex

Hi, I am Alex and I am the man behind Macpost. I am a blogger, author and a tech geek 👨🏻‍💻! I have over 5 years of experience in traditional marketing, advertising, media buying, digital marketing, and technical writing. Follow me on Linkedin

Leave a Comment